Title
Engagement resources in academic discourse: ǂa ǂstudy of ELT and ESP research article abstracts
Creator
Ilić, Katarina M., 1988-
CONOR:
133306377
Copyright date
2025
Object Links
Select license
Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
License description
Dozvoljavate samo preuzimanje i distribuciju dela, ako/dok se pravilno naznačava ime autora, bez ikakvih promena dela i bez prava komercijalnog korišćenja dela. Ova licenca je najstroža CC licenca. Osnovni opis Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/deed.sr_LATN. Sadržaj ugovora u celini: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/legalcode.sr-Latn
Language
Serbian
Cobiss-ID
Theses Type
Doktorska disertacija
description
Datum odbrane: 20.01.2026.
Other responsibilities
Academic Expertise
Društveno-humanističke nauke
University
Univerzitet u Nišu
Faculty
Filozofski fakultet
Group
Departman za anglistiku
Alternative title
Resursi angažovanja u akademskom diskursu : studija o apstraktima naučno-istraživačkih radova iz oblasti nastave engleskog jezika i engleskog jezika za posebne namene
Publisher
[K. M. Ilić]
Format
239 str.
description
Bibliografija: str. 224-235
description
Linguistics, Systemic Functional Linguistics
Abstract (en)
Academic writing serves not only to communicate research findings
but also to position the writer within a specific social and disciplinary
context. Grounded in this perspective, the present study explores
academic discourse as dialogic in nature, focusing on how authors
construct evaluative stance and engage with the academic community.
Drawing on Appraisal Theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics,
particularly the Engagement subsystem (Martin & White, 2005), the
study examines the use of heteroglossic expressions in research article
abstracts. The analysis aims to uncover how writers manage dialogic
space through strategies of dialogic contraction and expansion,
thereby shaping interpersonal meaning. The sample comprises 200
research article abstracts—100 from the field of English Language
Teaching (ELT) and 100 from English for Specific Purposes (ESP). A
mixed-methods approach is employed, combining corpus-based
quantitative analysis using UAM CorpusTool with qualitative
interpretation. The study follows a threefold structure: (1) analysis of
Engagement resources across the entire sample, (2) examination of
their distribution across rhetorical moves, and (3) comparison of ELT
and ESP sub-samples. Findings indicate a relatively balanced use of
dialogic contraction and expansion overall, with a slight preference
for expansion (51.2%). The second approach provides a detailed
analysis of how the frequency and function of specific Engagement
strategies vary across rhetorical moves. Comparative analysis
revealed marginally higher use of expansion in ELT and contraction
in ESP, with statistically significant differences in only three of the
nine strategies examined. This study contributes to the understanding
of interpersonal language use in academic writing and holds
pedagogical implications for teaching academic writing, particularly
in the fields of ELT and ESP.
Authors Key words
engagement resources, appraisal theory, academic discourse,
research article abstracts, English Language Teaching (ELT), English
for Specific Purposes (ESP), corpus-based analysis, dialogic space,
dialogic contraction, dialogic expansion
Authors Key words
resursi angažovanja, teorija vrednovanja, akademski diskurs,
apstrakti naučno-istraživačkih radova, nastava engleskog
jezika (ELT), engleski jezik za posebne namene (ESP), analiza
korpusa, prostor za dijalog, suženje dijaloga, proširenje
dijaloga
Classification
81'42:001.814(043.3)
Subject
H 004; H 350
Type
Tekst
Abstract (en)
Academic writing serves not only to communicate research findings
but also to position the writer within a specific social and disciplinary
context. Grounded in this perspective, the present study explores
academic discourse as dialogic in nature, focusing on how authors
construct evaluative stance and engage with the academic community.
Drawing on Appraisal Theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics,
particularly the Engagement subsystem (Martin & White, 2005), the
study examines the use of heteroglossic expressions in research article
abstracts. The analysis aims to uncover how writers manage dialogic
space through strategies of dialogic contraction and expansion,
thereby shaping interpersonal meaning. The sample comprises 200
research article abstracts—100 from the field of English Language
Teaching (ELT) and 100 from English for Specific Purposes (ESP). A
mixed-methods approach is employed, combining corpus-based
quantitative analysis using UAM CorpusTool with qualitative
interpretation. The study follows a threefold structure: (1) analysis of
Engagement resources across the entire sample, (2) examination of
their distribution across rhetorical moves, and (3) comparison of ELT
and ESP sub-samples. Findings indicate a relatively balanced use of
dialogic contraction and expansion overall, with a slight preference
for expansion (51.2%). The second approach provides a detailed
analysis of how the frequency and function of specific Engagement
strategies vary across rhetorical moves. Comparative analysis
revealed marginally higher use of expansion in ELT and contraction
in ESP, with statistically significant differences in only three of the
nine strategies examined. This study contributes to the understanding
of interpersonal language use in academic writing and holds
pedagogical implications for teaching academic writing, particularly
in the fields of ELT and ESP.
“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.

