Title
Empatija i savremena moralna subjektivnost: sociološki pristup interpretacijama neuronaučnih istraživanja
Creator
Andrejić, Ana R., 1975-
CONOR:
129068809
Copyright date
2024
Object Links
Select license
Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC 3.0)
License description
Dozvoljavate umnožavanje, distribuciju i javno saopštavanje dela, i prerade, ako se navede ime autora na način odredjen od strane autora ili davaoca licence. Ova licenca ne dozvoljava komercijalnu upotrebu dela. Osnovni opis Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/rs/deed.sr_LATN Sadržaj ugovora u celini: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/rs/legalcode.sr-Latn
Language
Serbian
Cobiss-ID
Theses Type
Doktorska disertacija
description
Datum odbrane: 03.09.2025.
Other responsibilities
University
Univerzitet u Nišu
Faculty
Filozofski fakultet
Group
Departman za sociologiju
Alternative title
Empathy and contemporary moral subjectivity a sociological approach to interpretations of neuroscientific research
: a sociological approach to interpretations of neuroscientific research
Publisher
[A. R. Andrejić]
Format
349 str.
description
Biografija autora: str. 349.
Bibliografija: str. 321-347.
description
Sociology of morality
Abstract (en)
The main objective of the doctoral dissertation is to gain
insight into how scientific research on empathy and its neural
mechanisms relates to contemporary understanding of moral
subjectivity. More specifically, the research aims to examine
conceptions of moral and social subjectivity in published papers
from new integrative disciplines, characterized by Vidal and
Ortega as "neurodisciplines” – from social neuroscience,
neurosociology, neuroethics, and the debate about biological
moral enhancement. Using conceptual critique and considering
integration of levels of analysis, the research investigates how
empathy is connected to neuroscientic findings about brain
activation, mirror-neurons, and the hormone oxytocin, as well as
to social and moral concepts.
The research findings demonstrate that neurodisciplinary
integration of concepts and levels of analysis involves
interpretation, which is contingent upon a cerebral conception of
subjectivity and methodological individualism. In
neurodisciplinary integration, neuroscientific knowledge takes
precedence, functioning as evidence for social and ethical
conceptions. Knowledge from the social sciences is of secondary
importance, and critiques of interpretations of neuroscientific
findings are largely absent. The dichotomy between the emotional
and the rational plays a crucial role in neurodisciplinary
knowledge production about empathy and other capacities of the
“social” and “moral brain”, with other biosocial dichotomies
mapped onto it. Emotional aspects of empathy and morality are
considered faster, evolutionary ancient, and more embodied,
serving as a link between social and moral concepts, and
neuroscietific findings.
The research indicates the compatibility between
neuroscientific knowledge and the neoliberal social context.
Drawing on Foucault’s framework of problematization, it can be
concluded that empathy is seen as an answer to questions about
the neural bases of morality and sociality under individualistic
assumptions about the subject. The contemporary proliferation of
scientific and popular discourses on empathy, its potential neural
bases, and proposals for its enhancement, is driven not only by
new scientific discoveries, but also by widely spread conceptions
of subjectivity. Therefore, its effect is to reinforce an
individualistic understanding of morality and sociality.
Authors Key words
empatija, moralnost, koncepcija subjekta, društvena neuronauka,
neurosociologija, neuroetika, biološko moralno poboljšanje,
interdisciplinarna integracija, nivoi analize, metodološki
individualizam
Authors Key words
empathy, morality, conception of the subject, social neuroscience,
neurosociology, neuroethics, biological moral enhancement,
interdisciplinary integration, levels of analysis, methodological
individualism
Classification
316:17]:618.8(043.3)
Subject
S 210
Type
Tekst
Abstract (en)
The main objective of the doctoral dissertation is to gain
insight into how scientific research on empathy and its neural
mechanisms relates to contemporary understanding of moral
subjectivity. More specifically, the research aims to examine
conceptions of moral and social subjectivity in published papers
from new integrative disciplines, characterized by Vidal and
Ortega as "neurodisciplines” – from social neuroscience,
neurosociology, neuroethics, and the debate about biological
moral enhancement. Using conceptual critique and considering
integration of levels of analysis, the research investigates how
empathy is connected to neuroscientic findings about brain
activation, mirror-neurons, and the hormone oxytocin, as well as
to social and moral concepts.
The research findings demonstrate that neurodisciplinary
integration of concepts and levels of analysis involves
interpretation, which is contingent upon a cerebral conception of
subjectivity and methodological individualism. In
neurodisciplinary integration, neuroscientific knowledge takes
precedence, functioning as evidence for social and ethical
conceptions. Knowledge from the social sciences is of secondary
importance, and critiques of interpretations of neuroscientific
findings are largely absent. The dichotomy between the emotional
and the rational plays a crucial role in neurodisciplinary
knowledge production about empathy and other capacities of the
“social” and “moral brain”, with other biosocial dichotomies
mapped onto it. Emotional aspects of empathy and morality are
considered faster, evolutionary ancient, and more embodied,
serving as a link between social and moral concepts, and
neuroscietific findings.
The research indicates the compatibility between
neuroscientific knowledge and the neoliberal social context.
Drawing on Foucault’s framework of problematization, it can be
concluded that empathy is seen as an answer to questions about
the neural bases of morality and sociality under individualistic
assumptions about the subject. The contemporary proliferation of
scientific and popular discourses on empathy, its potential neural
bases, and proposals for its enhancement, is driven not only by
new scientific discoveries, but also by widely spread conceptions
of subjectivity. Therefore, its effect is to reinforce an
individualistic understanding of morality and sociality.
“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.

