Title
Komparativno ispitivanje efikasnosti bazične, lasero i fitoterapije kod pacijenata sa hroničnom parodontopatijom
Creator
Petrović, Milica S. 1981-
Copyright date
2018
Object Links
Select license
Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
License description
Dozvoljavate samo preuzimanje i distribuciju dela, ako/dok se pravilno naznačava ime autora, bez ikakvih promena dela i bez prava komercijalnog korišćenja dela. Ova licenca je najstroža CC licenca. Osnovni opis Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/deed.sr_LATN. Sadržaj ugovora u celini: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/legalcode.sr-Latn
Language
Serbian
Cobiss-ID
Theses Type
Doktorska disertacija
description
Datum odbrane: 07.11.2018.
Other responsibilities
mentor
Kesić, Ljiljana
predsednik komisije
Obradović, Radmila
član komisije
Mihailović, Dragan
član komisije
Milašin, Jelena
član komisije
Kitić, Dušanka
Academic Expertise
Medicinske nauke
University
Univerzitet u Nišu
Faculty
Medicinski fakultet
Group
Katedra za bolesti zuba, oralnu medicinu i parodontologiju
Alternative title
Comparative investigation of the efficacy of the basic, laser and phytotherapy in patients with chronic periodontitis
Publisher
[M. S. Petrović]
Format
127, [5] listova
description
Beleška o autoru: listovi [128-132];
Prilog: listovi 125-127;
Bibliografija: listovi 101-124.
description
Parodontology
Abstract (en)
The aim of the investigation that was conducted as clinical prospective
study was to establish efficacy of the basic, low level laser therapy (LLLT)
and phytotherapy in patients with chronic periodontitis. Different
approaches in the treatment of chronic periodontitis were compared. Beside
basic (causal) therapy, that represents the ‟‟gold standard” for the treatment
of chronic periodontitis, LLLT and phytotherapy were performed.
The study included 111 subjects divided into 4 groups. The first, the
second and the third group was constituted as follows: 30 patients with
chronic periodontitis, who received basic periodontal treatment (I group),
combined basic and phytotherapy (II group) and combined LLLT and basic
therapy (III group), for five consecutive days. Clinical parameters were
measured before intervention, after the fifth treatment and after a month. All
subjects received oral hygiene instructions and full-mouth periodontal
treatment (professional removal of dental plaque and calculus, followed by
curettage of periodontal pockets). Afterwards, in group II, phytotherapy was
applied (Tinctura paradentoica ® Institut “Dr Josif Panĉić”, Beograd), while
in group III, Kavo LLLT (980 nm, 0.2 W, 6 J/cm2) was applied. Subgingival
samples were collected at baseline and after the fifth treatment to identify
following bacterial species: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans,
Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis
and Treponema denticola. Gingival swabs were taken, and direct smears
were prepared on slides for cytomorphometric analysis. The fourth group
included 21 periodontally healthy subjects in good general health. The results
were compared by clinical examination (oral hygiene indices, gingival and
periodontal indices), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for detection
of periodontopathogenic bacteria and cytomorphometric analysis.
The evaluation using clinical parameters showed better results in group
III, there LLLT was applied. Comparing the values of nuclear area after
therapy, it was established that their values were statistically significantly
higher in the basic therapy group, compared to the combined therapy groups
(II and III), independently (p < 0,001). After treatment, the following
bacterial species were found less frequently (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans,
Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella
forsythensis and Treponema denticola) in all studied groups, compared to
before treatment, except bacteria Tannerella forsythensis, that was found
more frequently in the basic therapy group. In the combined therapy groups
(II and III), a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of bacteria
was observed for Tannerella forsythensis and Treponema denticola (p <
0,001). However, in the LLLT group, statistically significant decrease in
the prevalence of the remaining bacteria was observed for the following:
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (p <
0,05), as well as Porphyromonas gingivalis (p < 0,01).
Based on previous findings, it could be concluded that combined LLLT
and basic therapy had better short - term outcomes compared to the basic
and phytotherapy as well as basic therapy itself.
Authors Key words
Hroniĉna parodontopatija, Laser, Fitoterapija, PCR, Citomorfometrijska
analiza
Authors Key words
Chronic periodontitis, Laser, Phytotherapy, PCR,Cytomorphometric
analysis
Classification
616.311.2-002-085(043.3)
Subject
B 730
Type
Tekst
Abstract (en)
The aim of the investigation that was conducted as clinical prospective
study was to establish efficacy of the basic, low level laser therapy (LLLT)
and phytotherapy in patients with chronic periodontitis. Different
approaches in the treatment of chronic periodontitis were compared. Beside
basic (causal) therapy, that represents the ‟‟gold standard” for the treatment
of chronic periodontitis, LLLT and phytotherapy were performed.
The study included 111 subjects divided into 4 groups. The first, the
second and the third group was constituted as follows: 30 patients with
chronic periodontitis, who received basic periodontal treatment (I group),
combined basic and phytotherapy (II group) and combined LLLT and basic
therapy (III group), for five consecutive days. Clinical parameters were
measured before intervention, after the fifth treatment and after a month. All
subjects received oral hygiene instructions and full-mouth periodontal
treatment (professional removal of dental plaque and calculus, followed by
curettage of periodontal pockets). Afterwards, in group II, phytotherapy was
applied (Tinctura paradentoica ® Institut “Dr Josif Panĉić”, Beograd), while
in group III, Kavo LLLT (980 nm, 0.2 W, 6 J/cm2) was applied. Subgingival
samples were collected at baseline and after the fifth treatment to identify
following bacterial species: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans,
Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis
and Treponema denticola. Gingival swabs were taken, and direct smears
were prepared on slides for cytomorphometric analysis. The fourth group
included 21 periodontally healthy subjects in good general health. The results
were compared by clinical examination (oral hygiene indices, gingival and
periodontal indices), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for detection
of periodontopathogenic bacteria and cytomorphometric analysis.
The evaluation using clinical parameters showed better results in group
III, there LLLT was applied. Comparing the values of nuclear area after
therapy, it was established that their values were statistically significantly
higher in the basic therapy group, compared to the combined therapy groups
(II and III), independently (p < 0,001). After treatment, the following
bacterial species were found less frequently (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans,
Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella
forsythensis and Treponema denticola) in all studied groups, compared to
before treatment, except bacteria Tannerella forsythensis, that was found
more frequently in the basic therapy group. In the combined therapy groups
(II and III), a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of bacteria
was observed for Tannerella forsythensis and Treponema denticola (p <
0,001). However, in the LLLT group, statistically significant decrease in
the prevalence of the remaining bacteria was observed for the following:
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (p <
0,05), as well as Porphyromonas gingivalis (p < 0,01).
Based on previous findings, it could be concluded that combined LLLT
and basic therapy had better short - term outcomes compared to the basic
and phytotherapy as well as basic therapy itself.
“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.