Title
Poređenje efikasnosti dva tipa biološke terapije u kombinaciji sa hemioterapijom u prvoj liniji lečenja pacijenata sa kolorektalnim karcinomom bez mutacija u RAS genima i sa metastazama u jetri
Creator
Džunić, Miljana, 1981-
CONOR:
33712999
Copyright date
2023
Object Links
Select license
Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
License description
Dozvoljavate samo preuzimanje i distribuciju dela, ako/dok se pravilno naznačava ime autora, bez ikakvih promena dela i bez prava komercijalnog korišćenja dela. Ova licenca je najstroža CC licenca. Osnovni opis Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/deed.sr_LATN. Sadržaj ugovora u celini: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/legalcode.sr-Latn
Language
Serbian
Cobiss-ID
Theses Type
Doktorska disertacija
description
Datum odbrane: 12.09.2023.
Other responsibilities
Academic Expertise
Medicinske nauke
University
Univerzitet u Nišu
Faculty
Medicinski fakultet
Group
Katedra za radiologiju, nuklearnu medicinu i osnovi kliničke onkologije
Alternative title
A comparison of the efficacy of two types of biological therapy combined with chemotherapy in the first line treatment of patients with colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutation and with liver metastases
Publisher
[M. M. Džunić]
Format
112 lista
description
Biografija autora: list 112.
Bibliografija: list. 91-106.
description
Oncology
Abstract (en)
In patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations, antibodies directed towards vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as well as antibodies that block epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be used in the first line treatment. The aim of the study is to define which type of biological therapy in combination with chemotherapy is more effective in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations. This prospective study included 101 patients treated in Clinic of oncology, University Clinical Centre of Niš, of which 50 patients received anti-VEGF therapy bevacizumab, and 51 patients were treated with anti-EGFR therapy (cetuximab or panitumumab) and chemotherapy. Patients that received anti-EGFR therapy had significantly better response rate (70,6 vs. 50%; p=0,034), depth of response (p=0,004) and metastases resection rate (66,67% vs. 46%; p=0,036) than treated with bevacizumab. Progression free survival was significantly longer in the anti-EGFR treatment group (12,1 vs. 8,5 months; HR=0,599; 95%CI[0,392-0,915]; p=0,016). Significantly lower risk for progression had women (HR=0,41; 95%CI[0,19-0,89]; p=0,025), patients older than 50 years (HR=0,54; 95%CI[0,34-0,85]; p=0,009), patients with left-sided primaries (HR=0,61; 95%CI[0,38-0,99]; p=0,047), with the number of metastases ≥5 (HR=0,35; 95%CI[0,13-0,91]; p=0,032) and diameter of metastases >5cm (HR=0,51; 95%CI[0,30-0,87]; p=0,014) when treated with anti-EGFR agents than with bevacizumab. There were no significant difference in overall survival in patients treated with anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents (30,4 vs. 25,5 months; HR=0,81; 95%CI[0,50-1,30], p=0,384). Patients with excellent performance status (ECOG 0) had significantly longer survival and lower risk for death if treated with anti-EGFR therapy (38,5 vs. 23,1 months; HR=0,35; 95%CI[0,15-0,82]; p=0,016). Distribution of serious adverse effects (grade ≥3) was not significantly different between treatment groups (37,2% vs. 30%; p=0,44). In patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations, biological treatment of first line should be directed towards EGFR blockade.
Authors Key words
Kolorektalni karcinom, metastaze u jetri, biološka terapija, preživljavanje, efikasnost
Authors Key words
Colorectal cancer, liver metastases, biological therapy, survival, efficacy
Classification
616.348-.351-006.6:616.36-33.2-085(043.3)
Subject
B 007
Subject
B 200
Type
Tekst
Abstract (en)
In patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations, antibodies directed towards vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as well as antibodies that block epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be used in the first line treatment. The aim of the study is to define which type of biological therapy in combination with chemotherapy is more effective in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations. This prospective study included 101 patients treated in Clinic of oncology, University Clinical Centre of Niš, of which 50 patients received anti-VEGF therapy bevacizumab, and 51 patients were treated with anti-EGFR therapy (cetuximab or panitumumab) and chemotherapy. Patients that received anti-EGFR therapy had significantly better response rate (70,6 vs. 50%; p=0,034), depth of response (p=0,004) and metastases resection rate (66,67% vs. 46%; p=0,036) than treated with bevacizumab. Progression free survival was significantly longer in the anti-EGFR treatment group (12,1 vs. 8,5 months; HR=0,599; 95%CI[0,392-0,915]; p=0,016). Significantly lower risk for progression had women (HR=0,41; 95%CI[0,19-0,89]; p=0,025), patients older than 50 years (HR=0,54; 95%CI[0,34-0,85]; p=0,009), patients with left-sided primaries (HR=0,61; 95%CI[0,38-0,99]; p=0,047), with the number of metastases ≥5 (HR=0,35; 95%CI[0,13-0,91]; p=0,032) and diameter of metastases >5cm (HR=0,51; 95%CI[0,30-0,87]; p=0,014) when treated with anti-EGFR agents than with bevacizumab. There were no significant difference in overall survival in patients treated with anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents (30,4 vs. 25,5 months; HR=0,81; 95%CI[0,50-1,30], p=0,384). Patients with excellent performance status (ECOG 0) had significantly longer survival and lower risk for death if treated with anti-EGFR therapy (38,5 vs. 23,1 months; HR=0,35; 95%CI[0,15-0,82]; p=0,016). Distribution of serious adverse effects (grade ≥3) was not significantly different between treatment groups (37,2% vs. 30%; p=0,44). In patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer without RAS genes mutations, biological treatment of first line should be directed towards EGFR blockade.
“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.