Title
		
		
			Euphemisms in English and Serbian public discourse
		
	
			Creator
		
		
			Radulović, Milica 1973- 
					
	
			Copyright date
		
		
			2016
		
	
			Object Links
		
		
	
			Select license
		
		
			Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
		
	
			License description
		
		
			Dozvoljavate samo preuzimanje i distribuciju dela, ako/dok se pravilno naznačava ime autora, bez ikakvih promena dela i bez prava komercijalnog korišćenja dela. Ova licenca je najstroža CC licenca. Osnovni opis Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/deed.sr_LATN. Sadržaj ugovora u celini: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/rs/legalcode.sr-Latn
		
	
			Language
		
		
			English
		
	
			Cobiss-ID
		
		
	
			Theses Type
		
		
			Doktorska disertacija
		
	
			description
		
		
			 
Datum odbrane: 03.08.2016.
		
	
			Other responsibilities
		
		mentor
				Mišić Ilić, Biljana 1962- 
				član komisije
				Vidanović, Đorđe
				član komisije
				Jovanović, Vladimir 1968- 
				član komisije
				Mišković Luković, Mirjana 1964- 
				član komisije
				Vukić, Maja 1973- 
				
			Academic Expertise 
		
		
			Društveno-humanističke nauke
		
	
			University
		
		
			Univerzitet u Nišu
		
	
			Faculty
		
		
			Filozofski fakultet
		
	
			Group
		
		
			Departman za anglistiku
		
	
				Alternative  title
			
			
				 Eufemizmi u javnom diskursu na engleskom i srpskom jeziku
			
		
				Publisher
			
			
				 [M. Radulović] 
			
		
				Format
			
			
				292, 5 lista
			
		
				description
			
			
				Autorova biografija: list 292
			
		
				description
			
			
				Humanities, Linguistics
			
		
				Abstract (en)
			
			
				The topic of the thesis is the analysis of the use of concealing euphemisms (Luchtenberg 1985: 24) in English and Serbian public discourse. Concealing euphemisms reduce the negative expressive force of the utterance/sentence, avoid dispreferred and impose preferred constructions of reality. The thesis shows that it is possible to expose a concealing euphemism by identifying a non-euphemistic alternative that can be used in the same context. In relation to this, the main aim of thesis is to show that the recognition of concealing euphemisms includes both the structural (lexico-semantic) and the interpersonal (lexico-pragmatic, epistemic and discursive) levels of analysis. The theoretical background that unifies all the levels of analysis is relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson 1995 et al.). We use the corpus-assisted qualitative analysis; the corpus is based on American, British and Serbian concealing euphemisms taken from political speeches and newspaper articles. The analysis includes the lexicosemantic analysis, the lexico-pragmatic analysis and the analysis of discursive strategies. The results of the lexico-semantic analysis show that, in political speeches, rhetorical effects are preferred, and newspaper articles strive for more precision. The lexico-pragmatic analysis is based on the proposed pragmatic algorithm which shows that an epistemically vigilant hearer can identify a concealing euphemism by analyzing interpretive hypotheses in accordance with the information given in a specific context and type of discourse. Concealing euphemisms are also viewed as discursive strategies (Van Leeuwen 2008: 23–74). The examples of the analyzed strategies were found in all corpora; they show that the issue of responsibility and even the issue of morality of actions can be ignored. The thesis integrates cognitive, communicative, epistemic and social aspects of verbal manipulation, by means of which we provide an account of meaning construction that can be used in the interpretative stage of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 1989 et al.), which studies representations of the world taken as common knowledge, which are actually socially instilled beliefs reproduced and perpetuated in language.
			
		
				Authors Key words
			
			
				Concealing euphemism, non-euphemistic equivalent, political
speeches, newspaper articles, relevance theory, lexico-semantic
analysis, lexico-pragmatic analysis, pragmatic algorithm, epistemic
vigilance, discursive strategies, interpretive stage of critical discourse
analysis
			
		
				Authors Key words
			
			
				Eufemizam skrivanja, ne-eufemistični ekvivalent, politički
govori, novinski članci, teorija relevancije, leksičko-
semantička analiza, leksičko-pragmatička analiza, pragmatički
algoritam, epistemička budnost, diskurzivne strategije,
interpretativna faza kritičke analize diskursa
			
		
				Classification
			
			
				811.163.41:811.111'373.49(043.3)
			
		
				Subject
			
			
				811.163.41:811.111'42(043.3)
			
		
				Subject
			
			
				H 350
			
		
				Type
			
			
				Tekst
			
		
			Abstract (en)
		
		
			The topic of the thesis is the analysis of the use of concealing euphemisms (Luchtenberg 1985: 24) in English and Serbian public discourse. Concealing euphemisms reduce the negative expressive force of the utterance/sentence, avoid dispreferred and impose preferred constructions of reality. The thesis shows that it is possible to expose a concealing euphemism by identifying a non-euphemistic alternative that can be used in the same context. In relation to this, the main aim of thesis is to show that the recognition of concealing euphemisms includes both the structural (lexico-semantic) and the interpersonal (lexico-pragmatic, epistemic and discursive) levels of analysis. The theoretical background that unifies all the levels of analysis is relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson 1995 et al.). We use the corpus-assisted qualitative analysis; the corpus is based on American, British and Serbian concealing euphemisms taken from political speeches and newspaper articles. The analysis includes the lexicosemantic analysis, the lexico-pragmatic analysis and the analysis of discursive strategies. The results of the lexico-semantic analysis show that, in political speeches, rhetorical effects are preferred, and newspaper articles strive for more precision. The lexico-pragmatic analysis is based on the proposed pragmatic algorithm which shows that an epistemically vigilant hearer can identify a concealing euphemism by analyzing interpretive hypotheses in accordance with the information given in a specific context and type of discourse. Concealing euphemisms are also viewed as discursive strategies (Van Leeuwen 2008: 23–74). The examples of the analyzed strategies were found in all corpora; they show that the issue of responsibility and even the issue of morality of actions can be ignored. The thesis integrates cognitive, communicative, epistemic and social aspects of verbal manipulation, by means of which we provide an account of meaning construction that can be used in the interpretative stage of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 1989 et al.), which studies representations of the world taken as common knowledge, which are actually socially instilled beliefs reproduced and perpetuated in language.
		
	
			“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into  internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core  xml  and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.
		
	
 
					